| Comment # | Community Representative | Category | Question/Comment | WSSC Water Response |
| 1 | Neighbor A | Site Security | Please provide citation and electronic copies or web links to such rule(s) or regulation(s) as well as citation to any authority WSSC alleges supports its interpretation of that enclosure of the entire property is required by rule or regulation. | WSSC Water's design decisions are in part based on Maryland’s Design Guidelines for Drinking Water Facilities which incorporating the 10-State Standard and Guidelines for the Physical Security of water Utilities (ANSI/ASCE/EWRI 56-10). (https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Permits/WaterManagementPermits/Documents/Design-Guidelinesfor- DW-Facilities.pdf) ANSI/ASCE/EWRI 56-10 states "The design of any security measure must always take safety and maintenance considerations in to account." "The primary goals of fencing and perimeter walls are to establish a legal demarcation by defining the perimeter boundary of a facility; to present a barrier that causes an intruder to make an overt action to penetrate that demonstrates intent; and to create a delay barrier against unauthorized access. "Establishing a clear zone that enhances lighting and surveillance." In addition, ASCE/EWRI 78-24 Guidelines for the Physical Security of Water and Wastewater/Stormwater Utilities recommends a 250 ft "open space between detection line and facility." The audience also recommends a minimum fence height of 6 feet, with 7-8 feet being preferred for critical infrastructure like water storage facilities. The American Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) of 2018—particularly Section 2013, which amended Section 1433 of the Safe Drinking Water Act—requires community water systems to conduct and periodically update risk and resilience assessments that include evaluation of both natural hazards and malevolent acts, including physical threats to critical infrastructure. EPA’s Baseline Information on Malevolent Acts, published as required by AWIA, supports utilities in identifying and assessing malevolent threats relevant to drinking water systems. Our internal WSSC RRA Final Draft Report 2025_0321 (J-100) explains AWIA’s mandate that EPA provide baseline information on malevolent acts so utilities can properly assess threats to critical infrastructure. The document states that AWIA required EPA to issue “Baseline information on malevolent acts that are relevant to CWSs, including acts that may either substantially disrupt the ability of the system to provide a safe and reliable supply of drinking water or otherwise present significant public health or economic concerns.” |
| 2 | Neighbor A | Site Security | If any such rule(s) or regulation(s) are cited, please explain why WSSC's facilities were not in violation of such for the past few decades that the current fencing has been in place. | The guidance for site security for critical infrastructure was published after 2001. No changes have been made to the Bradley Hills Standpipe site since guidance documents were published. As WSSC Water rehabilitates existing facilities these new security protocols will be implemented. Where none of the guidance documents state a specific distance from the assets, WSSC Water is conservative in the application to be as protective of critical infrastructure and to allow for future maintenance and update. |
| 4 | Neighbor A | Site Security | If no such rule(s) or regulation(s) are cited and WSSC claims to rely on any WSSC policies or procedures, please provide copies them, an explanation of when they became effective, confirm that they are publicly available, and provide web links to where they are maintained for public review. If WSSC alleges that it is relying on its own policies and procedures, please explain why WSSC's facilities were not in violation of those same policies and procedures over the past decades that the current fencing has been in place. | Guidance for site security was published after 2001. No changes have been made to the site since guidance documents were published. The expectation is for these new security protocols to be implemented when changes are made to the site. Where none of the guidance documents state a specific distance from the assets, WSSC Water is conservative in the application to be as protective of critical infrastructure and to allow for future maintenance and update. |
| 5 | Neighbor A | Site Security | If no rule, regulation, policy, or practice is identified, please explain what WSSC meant when its representative referenced a rule or regulation. | Maryland’s Design Guidelines for Drinking Water Facilities incorporate National Standards including the 10- State Standard and Guidelines for the Physical Security of water Utilities (ANSI/ASCE/EWRI 56-10) and ASCEWRI 78-24 are representative references used. The American Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) of 2018—particularly Section 2013, which amended Section 1433 of the Safe Drinking Water Act—requires community water systems to conduct and periodically update risk and resilience assessments that include evaluation of both natural hazards and malevolent acts, including physical threats to critical infrastructure. EPA’s Baseline Information on Malevolent Acts, published as required by AWIA, supports utilities in identifying and assessing malevolent threats relevant to drinking water systems. Our internal WSSC RRA Final Draft Report 2025_0321 (J-100) explains AWIA’s mandate that EPA provide baseline information on malevolent acts so utilities can properly assess threats to critical infrastructure. The document states that AWIA required EPA to issue “Baseline information on malevolent acts that are relevant to CWSs, including acts that may either substantially disrupt the ability of the system to provide a safe and reliable supply of drinking water or otherwise present significant public health or economic concerns.” |
| 6 | Neighbor A | Design | WSSC's slides indicate that "Site Preparation" will begin in "Early Summer 2024." Does that include fencing? If so, when and through what process will the fence be selected (and even if not tied to "Early Summer 2024," please provide these "when" and "what" explanations). As an observation: the community's opinion about the fencing is likely tied to the location of any temporary and permanent fence-lines, so the sooner WSSC acquiesces to reversion of the fence line to either its current position or some position as close thereto as reasonably possible, the sooner fence selection can occur. | The schedule for this project has changed. The target date for construction bid is Summer 2026. It is expected that the project would be awarded four to five months after advertising. The site preparation will happen with the relocation of the communications equipment and will include the construction fencing. The construction fencing will be completed this spring. The community's input will be requested for the final fence. |
| 7 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Please provide more in-depth details regarding the safety measures and processes WSSC will follow for lead containment. | The Contractor and any Subcontractors shall comply with Maryland’s Lead Standard, Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.16, as well as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA’s) Lead in Construction Standard, 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.62. The material removed from the tanks will be contained within the curtain containment system constructed around the tank. The material will then be vacuumed up into containers and removed from the site in a continuous process. |
| 8 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Please provide an explanation of the testing practices and testing schedule that WSSC will follow to ensure that lead does not become airborne in the neighborhood. Please provide the same information for soil contamination in surrounding properties. | Open air abrasive blasting shall not be permitted. The material removed will be contained within the curtain containment system constructed around the tank. The Contractor will be required to have a 3rd Party Hygienist on site during the blasting of the tank. Air samples will be taken continuously around the perimeter of the site during the coating removal process. Soil samples are taken on site prior to starting construction and at the end of construction. |
| 9 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Will WSSC commit to making available to residents the results of each lead containment test conducted to assure neighbors that lead is appropriately contained, along with such explanations as are necessary to make such results interpretable for laymen? | Yes. WSSC Water will soon establish a website presence for this project and will make results of lead containment tests available there . Please note that results can be delayed as they need to go to a lab for analysis. |
| 10 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Please explain whether WSSC has explored lead abatement methods that are less likely to make lead airborne. “Abrasive blasting” sounds like a process that is inherently difficult to contain (“blasting” usually is). | The blasting with steel grit abrasives is a practice used industry-wide in this application. The lead paint being removed is contained within a curtain containment system surrounding the tanks that maintains negative airflow. This system contains all the debris in the containment system and a dust collector is used to clean the air. Chemical stripping is another method used but only for small projects in detailed areas. Manual stripping can be used but is very labor intensive and is not practical in this application. Both these options are not practical due to the square footage of coatings that need to be removed. |
| 11 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | If alternative methods are listed in response to request 2.d., please explain why they were not selected for use. | The blasting with steel grit abrasives is used industry wide in this application and will be used on this project. The lead paint being removed is contained within a curtain containment system surrounding the tanks that maintains negative airflow. Chemical stripping is another method used but only for small projects in detailed areas so it will not be used on this project. Manual stripping can be used but is very labor intensive and is not practical in this application given the square footage of surface area involved. |
| 12 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Please provide details regarding the credentials of WSSC's selected contractor. | As part of the Invitation for Bid requirements the contractor will be required to hold a QP1/QP2 certification as well as a Maryland Department of the Environment’s Lead Poisoning Protection Program – Structural Steel Contractor Certification. |
| 13 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Please describe whether, how, and to what extent WSSC and its selected lead abatement contractor(s) are bonded and insured for the lead abatement project , including for claims made by injured homeowners. | Contractor is required to carry Commercial General Liability Insurance in the amount of $1 million single limit for bodily injury and property damage each occurrence with $2 million general aggregate that applies to project under contract. |
| 14 | Neighbor A | Lead Paint Abatement | Can lead paint removal be scheduled during the winter when neighbors are likely outside the least and thus least likely to inhale any airborne contaminants? | Depending on the coating brand used, temperature and humidity conditions must be in specific ranges to assure proper adhesion to the metal. These conditions are typically found from May to September. Paint removal must immediately precede the new coating so that the bare metal is not left exposed to the weather any longer than necessary |
| 15 | Neighbor A | Soil Erosion & Run-off | Please explain WSSC's plan to permanently divert all runoff water from the standpipe footprint (standpipes and surrounding paved surfaces) into storm drains/sewers. | The site will be graded to drain toward existing stormdrain infrastructure. |
| 16 | Neighbor A | Soil Erosion & Run-off | Please explain WSSC plan to permanent discontinue pumping water onto the standpipe grounds, leaving standing water for mosquitos to breed in. Please provide this explanation for both the project period and the permanently solution. | WSSC Water believes this is due to the sump pump pumping water out of the existing altitude valve vault. If this is the case then the issue will be resolved as the new altitude valve vault will be waterproof and ground water will not enter the vault. WSSC Water will also do grading on site to eliminate low areas that may create areas for ponding. |
| 17 | Neighbor A | Soil Erosion & Run-off | Please explain mosquito abatement plans during construction if a "containment bladder" or "silt fence" is utilized. | By design, Maryland erosion and sediment control devices do not hold water for more than 72 hours which is less then the gestation time for mosquitos. In addition, silt fence is a filtering device and does not contain runoff. Standing water should not be present on site during construction. |
| 18 | Neighbor A | Soil Erosion & Run-off | If WSSC plans to continue pumping water onto the property after the project is concluded, please explain its commitment to employ a permanent mosquito remediation plan for the property. | By design, Maryland erosion and sediment control devices do not hold water for more than 72 hours which is less then the gestation time for mosquitos. In addition, silt fence is a filtering device and does not contain runoff. Standing water should not be present on site during construction. |
| 19 | Neighbor A | Design | Has WSSC evaluated the possibility of erecting scaffolding around some or all of the perimeter of the property during the construction period to maintain pedestrians' customary use of the property to transit the neighborhood? If so, please provide all documentation related to such evaluation. | During construction, temporary fencing will be placed around the construction area, carefully avoiding the existing trees that are to remain, to provide a safe working zone for the contractors and any pedestrians walking around the site . |
| 20 | Neighbor A | Design | If WSSC has not previously evaluated the possibility of erecting scaffolding around some or all of the perimeter of the property during the construction period to maintain pedestrians customary use of the property to transit the neighborhood, is WSSC willing to conduct such an evaluation? If so, will WSSC commit to providing the community with a report of its finding, the basis for such, and the conclusions reached? | Scaffolding will not be required since the temporary construction fencing around construction area will provide for adequate safe separation between the work zone and the community outside the fence. |
| 21 | Neighbor A | Design | Please explain why a 3 to 5 foot corridor of scaffolding around some or all of the perimeter of the property would in any way inhibit the proposed project or be insufficient to protect pedestrians. | With protective construction fencing around the construction area keeping the publi |
| 22 | Neighbor A | Design | In the event that WSSC attempts to explain that above-mentioned corridor of scaffolding would be insufficient to protect pedestrians, please explain how the proposed scaffolding would be insufficient to protect pedestrians, but the abutting property owners and their properties are not at risk from the proposed project. | With protective construction fencing around the construction area of the site keeping the public a safe distance from the work zone, the added feature of scaffolding would have no additional benefit. |
| 23 | Neighbor A | Plat | If WSSC refuses to construct scaffolding to maintain the community's customary use of property to transit the neighborhood, please provide the land records associated with the "Bradley Hills Standpipe" property beginning at the point in time at which the "Bradley Hills Standpipe" property was severed from its parcel of origin. | Lot 3 was conveyed to Washington Suburban Sanitary District in Land Records of Montgomery County in Land Records Liber 691, Folio 15. Deed was recorded on March 28, 1940. Within these documents there are no encumbrances for public use of WSSC Water's parcel. Copies of documents can be provide or obtained for Montgomery County Land Records and are included in attached documents. WSSC Water does recognize the community's desire to maintain access for sage passage and until work with the community on the final site layout and restoration. |
| 24 | Neighbor A | Outreach | Will WSSC please commit to corresponding to the community via email in addition to the US Mail? | WSSC Water will provide project updates to community members both through US Postal Mail as well as through periodic emails provided to the designated Community Liaison (Ann Thiede) and distributed through the community listserv. |
| 25 | Neighbor A | Outreach | If WSSC declines to commit to communicating with the community via email, please provide an explanation of WSSC's reasons for declining. | WSSC Water will provide project updates to community members both through US Postal Mail as well as through periodic emails provided to the designated Community Liaison (Ann Thiede) and distributed through the community listserv. We are also launching a dedicated web page for the Bradley Hillss Standpipes Project to provide timely construction updates and information. |
| 26 | Neighbor A | Outreach | Please provide to the community the dates on which the Montgomery County Council and Montgomery County Executive will consider WSSC's proposed Fiscal Year 2025 Budget. If not scheduled yet, please commit to providing the community with no less than two weeks of notice of those dates when they are scheduled. | WSSC Water is currently in Fiscal year 2026. The FY2027 budget will be considered in April and May meeting of the Council. |
| 27 | Neighbor A | Budget | Please indicate whether the “Bradley Hills Standpipe” project is included in the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget. | Yes. Bradley Hills Standpipe is part of the Water Storage Facility Rehabilitation Project listed as W-105 in the budget book for FY2026, FY2027 and FY 2028 |
| 28 | Neighbor A | Budget | Please indicate which fiscal year budgets will include funding for the “Bradley Hills Standpipe” project if the project follows the timeline presented on March 20. | Funding is included in FY26, FY27, FY28. |
| 29 | Neighbor B | Design | Temporary Structures: At the meeting at Bethesda Elementary you stated that the current structures need to be moved to make room for working on the pipe stands. OK, so why can't they be moved to trailers/temporary structures while the work is ongoing, and then when the work is done, moved back to permanent structures away from the property lines? Temporary structures are common with MCPS school construction. I should know, as all three of our kids attended AT LEAST one semester of elementary school in a temporary classroom structure at MCPS. Our youngest daughter spent almost 2 YEARS in trailers between Bradley Hills and Woodacres. Temporary structures are good enough for children and teachers, but not for WSSC? | Construction of a large temporary co-location shelter is not feasible on this property due to the very limited ground space. The reduced number of telecommunications occupants on the site now enables improved organization and more efficient long‑term space management. The existing communications facilities cannot be restored to their previous location adjacent to the water tanks. Keeping equipment in that area would block essential maintenance access and create an unsafe working environment. Therefore, the ground‑mounted communication facilities will be installed 15 feet from the Commission’s property line, in compliance with Montgomery County setback requirements of one foot of setback for each foot of structure height along residential property lines, as specified in Telecommunications Facility Setbacks — Section 59‑G‑2.58. Verizon and MIEMSS have terminated their agreements with WSSC Water and have removed all antennas, cabling, and ground equipment from the site. Their departure significantly reduces the total number of carriers operating at the facility. With fewer occupants, the site can now be reorganized to optimize available space. All remaining carriers—AT&T, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS), and T‑Mobile—will be housed in separate shelters and/or compact outdoor enclosures in the southwest area of the property adjacent to Tank #1. |
| 30 | Neighbor B | Tree Removal/Planting | New Tree Planting: At the end of the meeting at Bethesda Elementary your 'tree person' was telling a group of us about all the various tree options we had, and how he would create this great 'wall of green' with evergreens. Yet here we are, with your latest plan accounting for exactly ZERO NEW TREES planted where they would be NEEDED THE MOST! Absolute, NO screening of the industrial site. | It remains the intent of WSSC Water to replace all trees removed on a one for one basis. Adjoining homeowners will also have input to tree selection. Holly and Arborvitae are two recommended evergreens that would provide all season screening. Replacement trees will be planted at the end of the project. Current plans are to remove 27 trees which include a dead Mulberry and a Yew and Arborvitae that are in the form of large shrubs. We will work with the community on placement and types of plantings. However, placement of trees will need to avoid being planted on top of or too close above and below ground infrastructure. |
| 31 | Neighbor B | Cellular Equipment | Cell Towers: The home I live in was purchased in the late 1960's, long before cell phones and cell towers. You can make the argument that people moved here knowing that there were water towers next door. For a long time the towers were the perfect neighbor; quiet, always minding their own business. Then, new structures and cell towers came in back in the late 90's, and with them - noise. Now with the construction, the whole cell tower/structure situation is a pig's breakfast. We understand things need to be done in the business of water. But your decision to get into the business of cell providers can't be OUR problem. | Since April 1963, WSSC Water has supported the Montgomery County Government’s Civil Defense radio system. Over time, this partnership expanded to include Public Safety Radio infrastructure, Maryland Institute for. Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS) , and the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) communications network. WSSC Water’s own fleet radio operations were also using telecommunications equipment located at this, and several water storage facilities. Over the years, a number of commercial wireless carriers have used this site, including Nextel, Sprint, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, and T‑Mobile. As of spring 2026, Verizon and MIEMSS have ended their agreements with WSSC Water and removed all antennas, cabling, and ground‑level equipment associated with their operations. Their departure has significantly reduced the number of organizations using the facility. With fewer tenants on site, WSSC Water can now reorganize the communications compound to improve safety and provide better access for maintenance activities. The remaining occupants—AT&T, MCPS, and T‑Mobile—will be consolidated into dedicated shelters and compact outdoor equipment enclosures located in the southwest portion of the property next to Tank #1.the reduced occupancy and updated modern enclosures will help reduce the previous noise issues. |
| 32 | Neighbor B | Tree Removal/Planting | Tree Removal: The amount of trees you are planning to remove is ridiculous and totally unnecessary. I don't even know what else to say about that. | Only trees to be removed are those that would prevent work from being completed, are unhealthy, or pose a risk to WSSC Water or neighboring properties. Most all of the property will be needed for staging and access by the large construction equipment that is required for the tank rehabilitation process. At a minimum trees replacement is one to one. More trees may be added as desired for screening and ascetics. WSSC Water will work with the community on the final location of the trees. |
| 33 | Neighbor B | Cellular Equipment | Noise: Please address how noise will be handled coming from the cell providers’ structures – this has been an issue in the past and with current plan with buildings at property lines will only become more so. | 1. Fewer Tenants and Reduced Noise Sources With fewer tenants on-site, WSSC Water is reorganizing the communications compound to improve safety and maintenance access. One cellular carrier is leaving the site, and both Montgomery County and the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems will no longer be present. This reduction leaves only two cellular providers, MCPS and WSSC Water significantly lowering overall activity and associated noise. 2. Consolidated Location and Modern Equipment AT&T, MCPS, and T‑Mobile will be consolidated into dedicated shelters and compact outdoor equipment enclosures located in the southwest portion of the property next to Tank #1. The use of modern, enclosed equipment reduces operational noise, and the new installations require fewer maintenance visits, which further decreases potential disturbances. 3. Noise‑Reducing Technology Improvements All remaining carriers will be installing new equipment at the consolidated location. Additionally, MCPS is considering transitioning to a battery‑based uninterruptible power supply (UPS) system, which would eliminate the need for a building backup generator on site and further reduce noise. 4. Landscape Buffering Where feasible, new trees will be planted between the carrier shelters and the property line. These plantings will serve as natural sound barriers, absorbing and deflecting sound through their leaves, branches, and trunks to enhance acoustic comfort for nearby properties |
| 34 | Neighbor B | Site Security | Walkway: The plan calls for a security fence to be erected at the property lines during construction and to remain after construction. This prevents safe pedestrian passage for school children. Also, it prevents any backyard escape for houses adjacent to the site if fire or some other disaster were to occur. During construction, a minimum of 4 foot passageway should be maintained. | WSSC Water will work with the Contractor to provide safe passage during construction. |
| 35 | Neighbor C | Cellular Equipment | What is the exact distance of the communication towers from all residential homes? | The center of the tower will be 28 feet from the east property line and 35 feet from the west property line. Using mapping information in GIS, the closest house, 5608 Vernon Place, will be 114 feet from the center of the town. Then next 2 closest, 5515 Brite Drive and 5513 Brite Drive, will be 152 and 159 feet from the center respectively. If there is a specific home owner that wants to know the exact distance, with permission of the home owner, we can survey the distance and provide it. |
| 36 | Neighbor C | Cellular Equipment | What is the estimated risk of the RF pollutants to residents in our area? | According to consumer guide published by the Federal Communication Commission(FCC), the exposure risk in excess of the FCC guidelines is extremely remote. However, third party testing services have been requested by WSSC Water to help address the community concerns. Once a third party report is generated WSSC Water will share the results with the community. WSSC Water has also contacted Montgomery County Health Department to see if they have any additional information. Any information will be provided to the community. |
| 37 | Neighbor C | Cellular Equipment | What studies have been done looking at the prevalence of symptoms of RF exposure in our specific area? | WSSC Water telecommunications division has no documented cases of radio‑frequency (RF) exposure–related symptoms associated with operations on this property. We are checking with County Health Department to see if they have any additional information WSSC Water has also contacted Montgomery County Health Department to see if they have any additional information. Any information will be provided to the community. |
| 38 | Neighbor C | Cellular Equipment | We would be grateful for further information regarding how the communication tower meets the latest health standards especially those published just this past November 2025 by the American Public Health Association, on Occupational Health and Safety, stating specifically: "Research Recommending Setbacks to Distance Towers from Schools | This request was sent to MRA, consultant, to reflect recent (February 2026) changes to temp tower loading design. Once a third party report is generated WSSC Water will share the results with the community. |
| 39 | Neighbor D | Tree Removal/Planting | Most of the trees are on the perimeter, far from the tanks and WSSC assets, and do not interfere with this rehabilitation project or WSSC ongoing operations. Further, the trees do not appear to be a threat to neighboring properties; proper care of those trees by WSSC would ensure their health and prevent the potential for damage. And, importantly, the neighbors want the trees to remain to partially cover up the view of the tanks. Given this, please explain in detail why you need to remove all the trees on the property. | WSSC Water will be limiting the removal of the trees on the property, however those that are in poor condition and/or have limbs that will impede the very large construction cranes/equipment that need to maneuver about the site will be removed to accommodate construction/rehabilitation work. Where feasible the fence will be placed around the perimeter trees to protect the trees during construction. |
| 40 | Neighbor D | Tree Removal/Planting | As stated previously, the vast majority of tall trees are on the perimeter, while a few other trees (mostly ornamentals) surround Tank #2. Most or all of these trees would not need to be removed if WSSC agrees to the current fence line or some position as close thereto as reasonably possible. Why can’t this be done? | WSSC Water will be limiting the removal of the trees on the property, however those that are in poor condition and/or have limbs that will impede the very large construction cranes/equipment that need to maneuver about the site will be removed to accommodate construction/rehabilitation work. Where feasible the fence will be placed around the perimeter trees to protect the trees during construction. |
| 41 | Neighbor D | Tree Removal/Planting | Trees have a multitude of benefits, including: improving air quality; reducing CO2 and thus combating climate change and global warming; improving soil health; reducing stormwater runoff and soil erosion; addressing the heat island effect in our cities; and providing habitat for birds and terrestrial wildlife. Most importantly, in this situation, trees screen the standpipes and increase property values. Cutting down all the trees is not consistent with one of WSSC’s Strategic Priorities and Objectives -- to “ Be a good citizen within our communities”. Does WSSC want to be seen by the community and the region as harming the local environment and not working with the community? | WSSC Water is aware of the benefits trees provide and does not remove them without reason. WSSC also must meet safety & security standards and maintain aging infrastructure. These efforts will require selected tree removal and the residents will be provided with a tree removal plan, for discussion. In addition, adjacent residents will have a say in replanting considerations which will most likely include evergreens to a large extent for all season screening. Just as the tanks are overdue for a "makeover" so is the landscaping which currently includes non-native invasive pears on-site and mostly native, but volunteer fence-line. Existing trees, particularly those along the property line, that interfere with new construction and/or are in poor condition will be removed. New trees will be added to the site to provide for screening for adjacent residents and for site beautification. |
| 42 | Neighbor D | Soil Erosion & Run-off | We ask that WSSC divert all run-off water from the standpipe footprint during construction and permanently. Please add the run-off on the south side of Vernon Pl (including to 5510 Bradley Blvd.) to WSSC’s plan to divert run-off during construction and permanently. | An asphalt apron will be constructed around the tanks to eliminate standing water around the tank foundations. Outward from this, the existing site topography directs stormwater away from the standpipes in the direction of existing drainage swales. The site will be graded generally to eliminate areas of standing water. |
| 43 | Neighbor D | Soil Erosion & Run-off | Please explain how WSSC plans to prevent soil erosion from the standpipes site during the construction process. | WSSC Water is required to follow the Maryland Standards for Soil and Erosion Control. The site will have silt fence around the perimeter and a stabilized construction entrance. Site will be inspected by an Environmental Analyst at least every 14 days specifically for erosion and sediment control issues to make sure that the site is in compliance. Prior to construction, we will also provide the community the contact information for the Environmental Analyst to call if they see an issue. |
| 44 | Neighbor D | Soil Erosion & Run-off | Please explain how WSSC plans to permanently prevent soil erosion from the standpipes property after the site has been re-graded and the construction finished. | The entire site will be planted with grass to permanently stabilize the site and prevent soil erosion. |
| 45 | Neighbor D | Site Security | What are the critical assets at this site that WSSC is trying to protect? If those assets are anything other than the water supply, please explain who owns the assets and why WSSC is taking responsibility for these assets? | In addition to the water supply in the standpipes, WSSC Water is responsible for protecting Commissionowned facilities, equipment, and operational assets at the site that support water production, storage, treatment, and distribution. These assets are owned and operated by WSSC Water and are essential to maintaining public health, regulatory compliance, and uninterrupted service. Any non-water-supply assets located at the site are either owned by the Commission or fall under WSSC Water’s responsibility because of their direct role in water operations, safety, or regulatory requirements. For these reasons, WSSC Water takes responsibility for securing these assets to reduce risk, prevent disruptions, and protect critical infrastructure. |
| 46 | Neighbor D | Site Security | What are the types of possible threats to those critical assets? Why weren’t protections undertaken before now? What is different today that indicates additional security protections need to be undertaken now? | The site faces risks such as unauthorized entry, vandalism, theft, and damage that could disrupt operations or impact public safety. A recent incident at the Bradley Hills Standpipes highlighted these concerns when the perimeter fencing was pried open, allowing a suspect to enter the site and vandalize the standpipes. While there was no impact to the water supply, the incident revealed gaps in the existing security measures. In the past, security measures were based on the risk level at the time and had generally been effective. However, recent unauthorized access incidents, increased awareness of infrastructure vulnerabilities, and a changing threat environment point to a higher level of risk today. As a result, additional security steps are being taken to better deter unauthorized access, improve response, and reduce the likelihood of similar incidents going forward. The American Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) of 2018—particularly Section 2013, which amended Section |
| 47 | Neighbor D | Site Security | Have there been any incidents at this site that would raise concerns about the security of the water? I am not asking about “unauthorized” people (neighbors) on the property, but incidents involving the water in the tanks? If so, please describe including, where possible, the type, timing and impact of the incidents. | There has been a recent incident at the site that raised security concerns. The perimeter fence was breached, allowing a suspect to enter the standpipe area and vandalize the tanks, creating an opportunity for more serious damage to the standpipes and related infrastructure. While there was no impact to water quality or service, the incident highlighted vulnerabilities and reinforced WSSC Water’s responsibility to take proactive steps to strengthen security and prevent more serious incidents, rather than waiting to respond after another event occurs. |
| 48 | Neighbor D | Site Security | Are there any incidents of standpipes in the U.S. being purposely contaminated (with bacteria, chemicals, etc.) in the last 5 years? If so, how many? With what? How? | Based on available public information, there have been no widely reported cases in the last five years of standpipes or municipal water systems in the U.S. being deliberately contaminated with bacteria or chemicals as an act of sabotage, terrorism, or intentional poisoning. No such incidents have been documented in major public records or national news during that time period (Google). |
| 49 | Neighbor D | Site Security | Has WSSC estimated the probability of a terrorist incident at the Bradley Hills Standpipes site? If not, why not? If yes, what is WSSC’s estimate? What were the assumptions for that estimate? | WSSC Water does not assign a specific numerical probability to a terrorist incident an individual site, as those types of threats are complex, constantly evolving, and influenced by a wide range of factors that can’t be reliably predicted with a set percentage. Instead, we take a risk-based approach that focuses on preparedness, prevention, and coordination rather than trying to predict the likelihood of a single event. WSSC Water regularly trains for potential acts of terrorism or sabotage and works closely with local, state, and federal emergency responders to stay informed of any credible threats to the water system. Through ongoing training, information sharing, and coordination with our partners, we continuously assess risk and adjust security measures as needed to ensure we are prepared to respond to emerging threats. |
| 50 | Neighbor D | Site Security | Does WSSC currently employ technology to monitor the site within the current fence and the standpipes? If not, why not? Would such a monitoring system eliminate WSSC’s need to remove the trees and install fencing around the perimeter? If not, why not? | WSSC Water is in the process of upgrading security at the site, including the use of security cameras (CCTV), which are not currently in place, and increased police patrols. These upgrades are intended to improve monitoring, detection, and response, and are part of a broader effort to strengthen overall site security. While CCTV and increased police patrols will significantly enhance situational awareness, they do not eliminate the need for physical security measures such as enhanced perimeter fencing or vegetation management. Cameras and patrols are most effective when paired with clear sightlines and controlled access points. Removing trees and installing fencing helps reduce hiding areas, improve visibility, and prevent unauthorized access, allowing technology and patrols to work as intended rather than relying on monitoring alone. |
| 51 | Neighbor D | Community Use | The Bradley Hills Standpipe site has provided a pathway between the Kenwood Park and South Bradley Hills neighborhoods for over 80 years. At this point, the community “owns” the right to cross through the site. How does WSSC plan to provide access during construction? | WSSC Water will work with the Contractor to provide safe passage during construction. |
| 52 | Neighbor D | Community Use | Similarly, how does WSSC propose to permanently provide access across the site? | WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 53 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Please provide electronic copies or web links to the Federal and State of Maryland regulations and/or policies that WSSC must meet in removing lead paint from the standpipes. | The contractor will be required to meet all Federal, State and OSHA requirements for removing the lead paint from the tank including Maryland’s Lead Standard, Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.16, as well as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA’s) Lead in Construction Standard, 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.62. 1926.62 - Lead | Occupational Safety and Health Administration https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Regulations/land/Documents/26.16.02%20Reduction%20of%20Lead %20Risk%20in%20Housing.pdf |
| 54 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | What are the applicable Federal and State regulatory requirements for protecting lead paint abatement workers? And, similarly, for neighboring properties. Please explain both in layman’s terms. How will WSSC ensure that those requirements are followed at all times? | The Contractor and any Subcontractors shall comply with Maryland's Lead Standard, Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.16, as well as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA's) Lead in Construction Standard, 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CER) 1926.62. The Contractor will be required to meet all Federal, State and OSHA requirements for removing the lead paint from the tanks. Specifically for the workers this includes blood testing lead levels prior to starting work to determine a baseline and throughout the project to monitor. There will be a decontaminant area for the workers to clean once they leave the contaminated area. The workers will wear respirators and be fit checked for respirators. The containment system will protect the surrounding area and properties from exposure to dust, debris, and paint over spray. Inspectors will be on site to assure compliance with code and regulations. |
| 55 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Will WSSC’s contractors use scaffolding and plastic sheathing around the tanks (down to and on the ground) to contain lead paint chips and debris as well as airborne particles? If not, how will the debris and airborne particles be contained? Similarly, how will the soil around the tanks be protected from lead contamination? | Yes, the containment system will cover the tanks from top to bottom and will have a floor to protect the soils. Soil testing will be done prior to beginning work and following completion of work for comparison samples. Any contamination that is determined to have occurred will be remediated in accordance with State Regulations. |
| 56 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Abrasive blasting is considered a hazardous method for removal of lead paint, and is illegal in some communities. If alternative methods to abrasive blasting were not explored for lead paint removal, can WSSC please do so now? | Abrasive blasting is commonly used in this application and it is not illegal in the State of Maryland. ((COMAR) 26.16) This project is much too large to consider using chemical stripping or manual stripping. Chemicals used in chemical stripping have their own associated environmental hazards and toxic fumes that must be handled as hazardous waste. Manual stripping is very labor intensive and still creates dust that must be contained and removed. Please keep in mind that during paint removal via blasting, the contractor is required to perform all work within a containment system and engineering controls. |
| 57 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Was encapsulation of the lead paint considered? If not, why not? | Yes, encapsulation was considered but was eliminated as an option because the existing paint coating is in poor condition. |
| 58 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | When and where did each lead abatement worker take lead paint removal training? If this is not available now, will WSSC provide the information and certification(s) to the community before work begins? | As part of the Invitation for Bid Requirements, the Contractor will be required to hold a QP1/QP2 certification and the Maryland Department of the Environment's Lead Poisoning Program-Steel Contractor Certifications. WSSC Water will provide QP1/QP2 certifications and the Maryland Department of the Environment's Lead Poisoning Program-Structural Steel Contractor Certifications for the contractor's personnel assigned to this project. |
| 59 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Please provide details on how and where lead paint debris will be disposed. | It is incumbent upon the Contractor to determine his own means and methods of hazardous waste disposal. Typically that will include vacuuming the debris in a continuous process from the containment system into a truck mounted holding tank and then transporting it to a state approved and licensed disposal facility. |
| 60 | Neighbor D | Lead Paint Abatement | Please explain in detail how the standpipes and soil around the tanks will be cleaned up after removal of the lead paint. | The soil around the tank were tested during design, and no levels were found to be higher than required remediation. This will be used to establish a baseline for construction. The contactor will use mats to protect the soil. Following the completion of the abrasive blasting and painting the soil will be tested again and if there are any changes the contractor will remediate the soil. |
| 61 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | One of WSSC’s stated Strategic Priorities and Objectives is to “Be a good citizen within our communities”. Given that, how did all this existing cellular ommunications equipment end up on the Bradley Hills Standpipes site without the surrounding neighborhoods being notified? Will WSSC commit to notifying the eighborhoods of any future changes in leases and equipment at the site? This should be done for not only adjacent homeowners but also those within 1000 or more feet. | Since April 1963, WSSC Water has supported the Montgomery County Government’s Civil Defense radio system. Over time, this partnership expanded to include Public Safety Radio infrastructure, the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS), and the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) communications network. WSSC Water’s own fleet radio operations were also using telecommunications equipment located at this water storage facilities. This site has also been recognized by the Montgomery County Tower Facilities Coordination Group (TFCG) as an approved colocation facility, supporting countywide efforts to coordinate and manage wireless infrastructure deployments. Over the years, a number of commercial wireless carriers have used this location, including Nextel, Sprint, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, T‑Mobile. WSSC Water will notify the neighborhoods of any future changes in leases at the site. |
| 62 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Have you measured the current radiation exposure levels for the public around the site? What is it? Please share it with the community. | Third party testing services have been requested by WSSC Water. Once a third party report is generated WSSC Water will share the results with the community. |
| 63 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | What is the estimated radiation exposure level for the public from the proposed permanent arrangement of the communication company shelters and the temporary cellular tower? | Value to be determined. Due to recent reductions in occupancy at the facility, WSSC will work with the occupants and the consultant to develop a new forecast. Once a third party report is generated WSSC Water will share the results with the community. |
| 64 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | What is the estimated radiation level for the public when the project is finished? | Value to be determined. Due to recent reductions in occupancy at the facility, WSSC will work with the occupants and the consultant to develop a new forecast. Once a third party report is generated WSSC Water |
| 65 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Have there been any leases or amendments thereto executed for the Bradley Hills standpipes site in the last 5 years? Are there any new leases or amendments to leases under consideration now or proposed for the future? | Yes, Sprint Terminated lease in April of 2022. WSSC Water received notice Verizon Wireless is terminating Lease on June 30, 2026, Existing lease documents will be updated with new Ground lease exhibits and updated lease terms. a New MOU / Lease documentation is required for Montgomery county Public Schools shelter. to update / replace the previous Montgomery County Public Safety agreement |
| 66 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Is WSSC aware of any recent (last 3 years) or future changes to the cellular equipment at the site? Are there any pending applications for new or modified cellular antennas or equipment? Is WSSC aware of any applications not yet submitted? | WSSC Water has and anticipate some normal, antenna repair/ replacement with existing vendors. Verizon Wireless has submitted a Lease termination notice and will be vacating the property in June 2026. There are no current or anticipated applications to modify or expand cellular antennas or equipment beyond upgrades as part of this project. |
| 67 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Are any of the cell company antennas on the roof of the shelters? Or, near the ground? Or, below 10 meters above ground? If so, which ones? Where? | No. not on the shelter roof. Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) antennas. RF receiving satellite signals to support E-911 Location services for emergency call processing. these are present, at the shelter roof line/ and or cable bridge, this Antennas technology similar to your Vehicle GPS antenna for navigation, approximately 8- 15 ft above grade. These will be relocated during the moves again in like elevations. the Cellular Transmission antennas are on top of the water tank and /or elevated level on the temporary tower. |
| 68 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | What is the rationale for locating the proposed communication equipment (4 permanent pads/shelters and a “temporary” tower) in the southeast corner of the property which has the greatest housing density of anywhere around the site and is in the neighborhood access path across the property – essentially the area which has the highest potential for public exposure? | To allow the required renovation and construction access to the tank and legacy communication shelters for demolition —and to provide a safe work environment—the temporary tower must be placed in the highest and flattest area of the property. Using higher ground allows us to install a shorter temporary structure while still achieving the necessary coverage during construction. This reduces construction time, minimizes visual impact, and provides safer conditions for crane and lifting operations. This location was also selected to reduce or avoid tree trimming and removal. Updated permanent communications shelter location (southwest corner) Following public feedback, the permanent shelters have been relocated near the site entrance. This allows efficient connection to power, fiber, and underground infrastructure adjacent to standpipe #1. Positioning the shelters here ensures reliable access for maintenance, minimizes utility trenching, and this keeps service vehicles inside the fence line away from neighbors. |
| 69 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | What is the rationale for locating the proposed communication equipment on the part of the site that is the hardest for communication company employees to access, except by foot. Is WSSC planning to put in a drive to that back southeast corner? | The temporary cell tower will be located at the southeast corner of the site, which is the highest elevation on site, with flat terrain, in order to minimize the size of the tower. The communication facilities will be located at the southwest corner of the site near the site entrance and near the standpipe that will support the communication equipment upon project completion. There are no plans to extend a driveway to the southeast corner of the site. |
| 70 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Did WSSC consider other alternative areas of the site for the cellular communication equipment? If so, what were they, and why were they rejected? | Yes, WSSC Water did consider alternative areas for the communication equipment. They were rejected because they did not meet the needs of the project described. The 3rd party vendors will have their antennas located on Tank 1 at completion of the project, so the communication buildings need to be nearby. The temporary tower is at the highest site elevation on a relatively flat open area near Tank 1. |
| 71 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | If WSSC did not consider other areas of the site for the cellular equipment, why not? Will WSSC do so now? For example, WSSC could examine the site for areas that have less potential for human exposure, easier access for workers, etc. | WSSC Water did consider other areas of the site for the communications equipment. The communication structures being located next to the paved site entrance makes access most convenient for workers. |
| 72 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Antennas at a height of 128-163 feet should provide better cellular transmission than antennas at 106+ feet; as a result, there are incentives for the cellular users to want to leave the antennas on the temporary tower. Does WSSC have an agreement in writing with all the public and commercial cellular organizations that the temporary tower will be removed and the cellular antennas relocated immediately upon finishing the tank rehabilitation project? If not, why not? Will you share these agreements with the community? | The temporary tower will remain in place until the storage tank rehabilitation project and inspection process are completed. after which the temporary tower occupants will relocate their antennas to the new tank‑roof structure. and then remove the temporary tower. WSSC Water will prepare Temporary Tower Lease Amendments to formally document the purpose and objectives of the temporary tower, outlining each party’s responsibilities and the requirement to remove all temporary facilities and restore equipment to the tank structure once rehabilitation work is complete. We will need to consult with WSSC Legal in reference to sharing leasing agreements with community. |
| 73 | Neighbor D | Cellular Equipment | Why does your diagram in slide 13 showing which companies own the various shelters on the site not match the Montgomery County tax records? | Existing lease documents will be updated with new ground lease exhibits, that will be recorded to update the tax records. |
| 74 | Neighbor D | Design | Standpipes are old technology and notorious for failure (e.g., the current state of Tank #2) and for providing inadequate pressure. Furthermore, Bradley Hills Tank #1 is nearing the end of its useful life. WSSC will soon be facing the need to consider replacement of Tank #1, most likely with newer technologies. Please explain why rehabilitating the tanks, especially Tank #1, is the best long-term, fiscally-responsible decision for the current situation. | Structural rehabilitation and recoating of the existing tanks can provide 25-30 years of extended useful life at less capital cost than designing and constructing a new elevated storage facility. Steel storage facilities can last forever if properly coated and maintained. In addition, having two standpipes provides for operational flexibility within the system that has value. The volume of water that the tanks provide ensure safe drinking water to the region. |
| 75 | Neighbor D | Design | Did WSSC consider replacing one (1) or both tanks with a newer and better technology? If not, why not? | It was WSSC Water's decision to maintain the operational flexibility of having two tanks on site. New technology alternatives were not considered. Elevated storage faculties utilize gravity which is the cheapest, quietest and most reliable technology as compared to a pumping system. |
| 76 | Neighbor D | Design | What are the impediments to switching to a different technology at this time? | There was no technology identified that would offer a clear and economical advantage. Other technologies would increase maintenance required, increased capital expenditure, and increased activity on site. |
| 77 | Neighbor D | Design | Has WSSC considered removing one (1) or both of the standpipes, using a newer, different technology, and opening up part of the site to a community park? If not, why not? | Having two tanks on site offers clear operational flexibility and system redundancy. Elimination of one of the tanks was would reduce the redundancy in the system and the ability to provide fire flow to the community during an emergency if other tanks are being rehabilitated. Other technologies would increase maintenance required, increased capital expenditure, and increased activity on site. |
| 78 | Neighbor D | Outreach | I want to stress the lack of communication with the community on the Bradley Hills Standpipe project and on the community meeting held on March 20 (again, without attributing any fault on WSSC’s part). Less than a handful of people around the site received a letter regarding WSSC’s plans, and I do not know anyone who received the WSSC postcard about the community meeting (contrary to statements to some Montgomery County Council members or their staff). I don’t know how WSSC is handling communications via mail, but it is NOT WORKING. The only reason that there were so many people at the Community Meeting was that people in the neighborhood put out emails and distributed flyers door to door throughout a large area around the standpipes. | We appreciate this feedback regarding communication and outreach for the Bradley Hills Standpipe project and the March 20, 2024 community meeting. We understand the concerns raised about awareness of project notifications and meeting outreach and have reviewed our communication approaches to help ensure information better reaches the broader community. There have been a number of changes since that meeting, and we are working within our Office of Strategic Partnerships and Community Impact to strengthen outreach and collaboration with the community on projects. We will be launching a dedicated project webpage to provide construction updates and timely information. We also appreciate the neighborhood’s efforts to help share information and encourage participation. In advance of any future community meetings, WSSC Water will provide ample notice and cast a wide net in inviting members of the community not only via postal mail, but through the Kenwood Park Citizens Association and the South Bradley Hills community, as well as through social media channels. We will be launching a dedicated webpage for the project to provide construction updates and timely information. |
| 79 | Neighbor D | Outreach | It was not clear in the meeting how WSSC was going to develop of list of interested parties and exactly how future information would be distributed. WSSC’s approach to communicating with its neighbors and the surrounding community was left hanging. Please inform the community of how you plan to communicate in the future, and make an effort to collect the necessary information to do so. More than one method of communication would be best. | It is vital for our customers and neighbors to clearly understand how we will communicate moving forward. In advance of any future community meetings, WSSC Water will provide ample notice and cast a wide net in inviting members of the community not only via postal mail, but through the Kenwood Park Citizens Association and the South Bradley Hills community, as well as through social media channels. Our goal is to ensure the community remains well-informed and meaningfully engaged as the project progresses. |
| 80 | Neighbor D | Outreach | As an observation, WSSC could solve a lot of the communities’ concerns by 1) keeping the fence where it is, or close to that position, 2) not removing the trees and not re-grading the site, 3) maintaining community access across the site, 4) moving the cellular equipment to the middle of the site, and 5) thoroughly explaining their lead paint removal and containment plan. | Please note that community concerns and next steps will be outlined in a detailed presentation. We will meet with the community this spring prior to construction and the community meeting date is yet to be determined. At that time the community will see the revised permanent fence location which is not much different than the existing fence. They will see the proposed tree plan which shows only the damaged trees on site and those interfering with construction being removed, in addition to the many trees that will remain and also numerous new trees being planted. Plans will show that community members will have ample access to the site post construction and the fact that the communication equipment will be relocated to maximize that access on the north side. We will also explain the containment system for the lead paint removal. |
| 81 | Neighbor E | Tree Removal/Planting | According to the latest slide presentation, WSSC still plans to remove the trees on the perimeter of the water tower site even though it is not necessary for their renovation project. This is important to the neighbors because the trees partially cover up the view of the tanks and make it seem less industrialized. Furthermore, trees have a multitude of benefits, including improving air quality, reducing CO2 and thus combatting climate change, improving soil health, reducing stormwater runoff and soil erosion (an issue at this site), addressing the heat island effect in our city, and providing habitat for birds and terrestrial wildlife. Removing the trees is not acceptable to the neighborhood, and will definitely be seen as harming the environment and against the community’s wishes. Furthermore, the majority of the trees are on the perimeter, away from the tanks where the work will be done, and do not need to be removed. It is simply not necessary! | WSSC Water realizes the benefits of trees listed by Neighbor E and also realizes that the negative environmental impacts are more than balanced by the improved security of the critical infrastructure and safety for construction workers. Only trees to be removed are those that would prevent work from being completed, are unhealthy, or pose a risk to WSSC Water or neighboring properties. At a minimum trees replacement is one to one. More trees may be added as desired for screening and ascetics. WSSC Water will work with the community on the final location of the trees. |
| 82 | Neighbor E | Fencing | The WSSC diagram shows that the entire site will be fenced in at the perimeter/lot lines. Although it is presented to be temporary fencing, we have learned that the fence location will be permanent. This is unacceptable not only to the neighbors, but also to the larger surrounding community. The water tower site has been used as green space and a walkway between the neighborhoods since the houses were built in the 1940s – for over 80 years. Kenwood Park residents use it to go through the neighborhoods to downtown Bethesda. You can walk via a series of public roads and rights-of-ways to downtown Bethesda to shop or dine, and return. My husband and I, as well as others in South Bradley Hills, use the path through the water tower site to walk in Kenwood Park, thereby avoiding walking on heavily travelled Bradley Blvd. (with no sidewalks). There is no other accessible, safe route through the neighborhood. | WSSC Water understands the community’s concerns regarding fencing and the long-standing informal pedestrian use of the water tower site. We are committed to strengthening coordination with the Montgomery County and community stakeholders as we continue to evaluate impacts and consider potential options. This includes exploring a more formalized collaborative group of WSSC Water staff, elected officials, County representatives, and civic association leaders to help review requests and work through complex issues like this together. In addition, WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 83 | Neighbor E | Fencing | Most importantly, the children use the path through this site to go to Walt Whitman High School and Pyle Middle School. Walkability and Safe Routes to Schools is a big concern in Montgomery County and the nation. WSSC’s actions cut against that public policy interest. It forces more foot traffic onto Bradley Blvd. which has no sidewalk. One of the children on our block was recently hit by a car waiting at Bradley Blvd. and Vernon Pl. (fortunately she was not seriously injured). Cutting off access to Radnor Rd. by fencing in the site takes away the ability to safely walk to school. | We understand the communities' concern for safety. We have initiated communications with Montgomery County to relocate the bus stop to help address the safety issues. In addition, WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 84 | Neighbor E | Plat | Further, fencing the entire property is contrary to the history of use and legal covenants pertaining to this site. The owner’s dedication in the plan for this subdivision “dedicate[s] the streets and walks to public use”. It is clear that the intent was for the neighborhood to have access across the WSSC property from the 10 foot wide public right-of-way on Vernon Pl. to the Radnor Rd. driveway and vice versa. Otherwise, the subdivision plan makes no sense. After 80 years, the community “owns” access across this property. Furthermore, WSSC previously agreed to limit the industrialization of this site including retaining the current fence location. It is simply not acceptable to renege on these precedents and commitments. | WSSC Water staff have reviewed the Plat and deed for the WSSC Water property and subdivision referred to in the plat. The plat created by Hagner (Plat 1209) grants of a 10’ public walk that dead-ends at WSSC Water's property. As the lot WSSC Water retained was not included in the subdivision (per note within Lot 56 on the plat), and WSSC Water was not a party to the plat by signing it, then there was no grant that implied ingress and egress across WSSC Water land. Communities historic use of the property does not give the community legal rights to the property. However, WSSC Water recognizes the benefit of the property to the community and will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 85 | Neighbor E | Site Security | Related to the above comments on fencing, WSSC appears to think that fencing at the perimeter provides greater site security and their slides reference Maryland and national Design Guidelines for Drinking Water Facilities. Interestingly, those design guidelines DO NOT recommend fencing on the perimeter. The referenced ANSI/ASCE guidelines in fact are flexible, performance-based guidelines and are written in permissive language that challenges utilities to exercise judgment in selecting ppropriate security options for a specific site. WSSC has plenty of flexibility to consider the community’s interests, especially the historical and legal use of the property as well as the utility’s previous commitments. | WSSC Water recognizes the benefit of the property to the community, but must balance that with the protection of the critical infrastructure. After reviewing all options, WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 86 | Neighbor E | Lead Paint Abatement | Related to the above comments on fencing, WSSC appears to think that fencing at the perimeter provides greater site security and their slides reference Maryland and national Design Guidelines for Drinking Water Facilities. Interestingly, those design guidelines DO NOT recommend fencing on the perimeter. The referenced ANSI/ASCE guidelines in fact are flexible, performance-based guidelines and are written in permissive language that challenges utilities to exercise judgment in selecting ppropriate security options for a specific site. WSSC has plenty of flexibility to consider the community’s interests, especially the historical and legal use of the property as well as the utility’s previous commitments. | Encapsulation is not an effective coating method for this application as the new coating needs clean metal to adhere to. The existing coating is well beyond it's service life and must be removed for this purpose. Residents will be protected from lead exposure by the containment system that the Contractor will be using during the paint removal process. The Contractor is required to be certified for lead paint removal including Maryland Department of the Environment’s Lead Poisoning Protection Program – Structural Steel Contractor Certification and the QP1/QP2 certifications. |
| 87 | Neighbor E | Cellular Equipment | I appreciate that this plan shows the communications shacks at a distance from most of the residences. However, I don’t understand the rationale for placing them in the “tightest” corner of the property. Can these shacks be placed between the standpipes? Or, can these shacks be moved closer to the water towers? And, why is the cell tower in the southeast corner of the site, which will be difficult for workers to access and is right on top of 5608 Vernon Pl? Can the “temporary” cell tower be placed farther from residences, or between the water towers? Is the cellular equipment to be returned to the top of the water tower after its rehabilitation, and, if so, why is the older Tank #1 being used? It is also clear that a 162 foot cell tower will provide better cellular transmission than the current 107 foot water tower. The cell companies will want to stay there. Before proceeding, WSSC needs an agreement in writing with the cell companies that their cellular antennas will be relocated immediately after the tank rehabilitation project – and WSSC needs to agree that the “temporary” cell tower will be taken down | The project team evaluated multiple placement options for both the temporary tower and the carrier ground equipment, but several constraints limit where these facilities can safely be located.
|
| 88 | Neighbor E | Outreach | Despite WSSC’s own Strategic Priorities and Objectives to “Be a good citizen within our communities”, their previous commitments in writing to work with the community, and their similar commitment in 2024 as part of this project, WSSC is NOT working with the community to develop a mutually agreeable plan for renovating the Bradley Hills water towers (a.k.a. standpipes). WSSC’s latest presentation says that they will meet virtually with the community AFTER tree removal, fencing, and relocation of communication equipment – AFTER all the damage has been done. Tree removal, fencing and communication equipment location are the major items for which the community is most concerned. WSSC needs to meet in person with the community before proceeding with any work. | WSSC Water is carefully considering and responding to all community questions and concerns. Once we have finalized our review and response of these questions and concerns, a community meeting will be held this spring prior to proceeding with any construction work. |
| 89 | Neighbor E | Design | WSSC’s presentation obscures the final plan for the site, and thus appears deceptive. The fencing is presented as “temporary fencing” despite the fact that this is the location for the permanent fencing (according to WSSC staff). The presentation shows a “temporary tower” close to houses on Vernon Pl and that tower remains on the plan in the end. It looks like that cell tower, in fact, will stay in the “temporary” position (see final overhead slide of the site). Also, although not stated, the cell company shacks are shown on the plan, apparently in their final location (see overhead slide near the end again). What the community wants to know is: What is the final, permanent plan for this site? That plan has not been provided by WSSC. And, if these slides represent the permanent plan, it is unacceptable. | The final fenceline will be in a different location from the temporary fence. The temporary communications tower will be in place only during construction and will be removed once the work on the standpipes is completed and the communication antennas are relocated to Standpipe 1. The communication structures on the ground will be relocated to their final location before construction on the standpipes begins and they will be located in the southwest area of the site. The plan showing final location of the communications equipment and fence will be presented in a community meeting in the spring 2026. |
| 90 | Neighbor E | Design | Standpipes are old technology and notorious for problems and failure (Tank #2 is an example of such failures). Furthermore, Tank #1, installed in 1939, is near the end of its useful life. Engineers may say it is sound today, but it is 87 years old and will soon need to be replaced. Taxpayer/customer money is being wasted on rehabilitating these water towers – it is not the best long-term, fiscally-responsible decision given the age and state of the Bradley Hills standpipes. There are newer technologies with smaller footprints and that are more cost effective. Eliminating the water towers in favor of newer pumping technologies has the added benefit of opening up greenspace for the community. Cell communications could be accommodated on the site with a cell tower that looks like a large tree (there are others in the area), or moved to the nearby tower on the Kenwood Golf Course. | Elevated Storage Facilities rely on gravity to provide pressure to the water system. Pumping Stations require the continual running of the pumps to provide water to the system. Pumping stations also require much more maintenance over the life cycle and are susceptible to power outages. The existing standpipes overall are still in good shape. Tank 1 existing roof is bow thrust style which is very vulnerable to corrosion. The new roof will be a rafter style roof. Upgrades also include manways and ladders and bringing them to meet current OSHA standards. Construction of a new elevated water storage tank at this location is not feasible due to the limited space available on WSSC Water property. For the same reason, installing a wireless monopole disguised as a tree is also not a viable option. The constrained site footprint creates safety concerns related to the artificial branches and foliage typically used on these structures; during wind events, these plastic components could detach and pose hazards to onsite personnel and adjacent properties. In addition, maintaining the artificial foliage and antennas would require frequent service access using an articulating boom lift. This equipment would need ground space that the site cannot provide and would generate recurring noise impacts to the surrounding community during maintenance operations. |
| 91 | Neighbor E | Design | Please explain the use/need for 2 standpipes, as we understand that only one is in use. | Two standpipes allow for safety in redundancy and for more efficient system operation. With one tank down we are having to pull supply from other parts of the system to serve needs in the area. Both tanks are currently in service, as of 04/03/2026, in case of an emergency this will ensure there is ample water storage in the area and will protect against boil water alerts. |
| 92 | Neighbor E | Plat | Please address how WSSC is adhering to the original land grant/dedication for land use. | WSSC Water staff have reviewed the Plat and deed for the WSSC Water property and subdivision referred to in the plat. The plat created by Hagner (Plat 1209) grants of a 10’ public walk that dead-ends at WSSC Water's property. As the lot WSSC Water retained was not included in the subdivision (per note within Lot 56 on the plat), and WSSC Water was not a party to the plat by signing it, then there was no grant that implied ingress and egress across WSSC Water land. WSSC Water recognizes the benefit of the property to the community and will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 93 | Ann Theide | General | The updated presentation ignores *all* of the previously provided community feedback, does *not* address the community’s suggested compromise configurations and does *not* address any of the community’s concerns. In fact, there is more encroachment to the property lines, expanding the industrial footprint. | WSSC Water has revised the plans to address as many of the community comments as possible while still protecting the critical infrastructure . The revisions include reduction in number of trees to be removed, minimization of telecommunications equipment with final location, and final fencing location. WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. |
| 94 | Ann Theide | General | WSSC is *not* honoring these commitments. WSSC *is* being *deceptive* in their presentation by *not* communicating clearly the final site configuration with respect to final fence placement, final county/cell company shack locations, and timelines. | WSSC Water has revised the plans to address as many of the community comments as possible while still protecting the critical infrastructure . The revisions include reduction in number of trees to be removed, minimization of telecommunications equipment with final location, and final fencing location. WSSC Water will be maximizing the public use of the property after construction. This will include a minimum of 10 feet between the property line and the fence around the south of the property linking Vernon Place to Radnor Road. These items will be presented to the community during a meeting in the Spring 2026. |
| 95 | Ann Theide | General | At the meeting at Bethesda Elementary you stated that the current structures need to be moved to make room for working on the pipe stands. OK, so why can't they be moved to trailers/temporary structures while the work is ongoing, and then when the work is done, moved back to permanent structures away from the property lines? Temporary structures are common with MCPS school construction. I should know, as all three of our kids attended AT LEAST one semester of elementary school in a temporary classroom structure at MCPS. Our youngest daughter spent almost 2 YEARS in trailers between Bradley Hills and Woodacres. Temporary structures are good enough for children and teachers, but not for WSSC? | There is no need for temporary structures for this project, other than the tower, since the communication facilities can move to their permanent location before work begins on the tanks. The communication facilities can not be returned to the same location that they are currently immediately adjacent to the tanks. The reason for this is that it leaves no room at all for access by maintenance staff around the tanks and makes for an unsafe working environment. The new location for the facilities provides for better access to those facilities from the site entrance while minimizing the impact to some of the underground infrastructure on site. |
| 96 | Rebekah | Cellular Equipment | What is the exact distance of the communication towers from all residential homes? | The center of the tower will be 28 feet from the east property line and 35 feet from the west property line. Using mapping information in GIS, the closest house, 5608 Vernon Place, will be 114 feet from the center of the town. Then next 2 closest, 5515 Brite Drive and 5513 Brite Drive, will be 152 and 159 feet from the center respectively. If there is a specific home owner that wants to know the exact distance, with permission of the home owner, we can survey the distance and provide it. |
| 97 | Rebekah | Cellular Equipment | What is the estimated risk of the RF pollutants to residents in our area? | Third party testing services have been requested by WSSC Water. Once a third party report is generated, WSSC Water will share the results with the community. |
| 98 | Rebekah | Cellular Equipment | What studies have been done looking at the prevalence of symptoms of RF exposure in our specific area? | WSSC Water’s Telecommunications Division has no documented cases of radio‑frequency (RF) exposure–related symptoms associated with operations on this property. Staff has attempted to contact the Montgomery County Department of Health by phone, left a message, and is currently awaiting a response. |
| 99 | Rebekah | Cellular Equipment | We would be grateful for further information regarding how the communication tower meets the latest health standards especially those published just this past November 2025 by the American Public Health Association, on Occupational Health and Safety, stating specifically: “Research Recommending Setbacks to Distance Towers from Schools” | This request was sent to MRA, consultant, to reflect recent (February 2026) changes to temp tower loading design. Once a third party report is generated, WSSC Water will share the results with the community. |
Last Modified: June 2, 2026, 12:38 pm EDT